How To Fix Terrarium You Need To Captcha

Question

How do I fix Firefox so the Captcha boxes are back?

Problem: Accessing a site I've always used with ease, and siumilar others, login pages no longer show the Captcha "I'm non a robot." that uses the images "Click on the street signs", or "cars" or... etcetera. All the same, Chrome displays it fine, as does IE.

TESTS: - Tried to admission with add-ons at normal. FF has, as e'er, has Adobe products blocked. FF refuses to permit me employ information technology anyway, refuses to let me upgrade information technology because the FF "Upgrade" link simply opena a Moz wall of geekinese attempting to explicate that FF is protecting me - merely no update. I fought FF and was withal able to update Adobe stuff.

- Tried with all addons disabled.

- The "About Mozilla Firefox" screen that cannot be copied and pasted here on barely visible, very low-cal greyness font "Firefox is upwards to date". 52.1.2 (32-bit) Obviously, it is at present called Firefox ESR. What ever that means.

I've attached an image showing both versions. The working 1 by the Stalker - Chrome, and the one that quit by Firefox.

How do I fix Firefox so the Captcha boxes are back?

O

Problem: Accessing a site I've always used with ease, and siumilar others, login pages no longer show the Captcha "I'g not a robot." that uses the images "Click on the street signs", or "cars" or... etcetera. Yet, Chrome displays it fine, equally does IE. TESTS: - Tried to admission with add-ons at normal. FF has, every bit always, has Adobe products blocked. FF refuses to let me use it anyhow, refuses to let me upgrade it because the FF "Upgrade" link merely opena a Moz wall of geekinese attempting to explain that FF is protecting me - simply no update. I fought FF and was still able to update Adobe stuff. - Tried with all addons disabled. - The "Almost Mozilla Firefox" screen that cannot be copied and pasted here on barely visible, very light gray font "Firefox is upwards to date". 52.1.2 (32-bit) Obviously, information technology is now called Firefox ESR. What ever that means. I've attached an image showing both versions. The working one past the Stalker - Chrome, and the one that quit past Firefox. How practise I fix Firefox so the Captcha boxes are back? O

Attached screenshots

Called solution

I besides had this problem, and found another affair to attempt if none of the above piece of work. If you hate existence tracked and are a browser tweaker, you lot may (at some point in the by) take adapted the value of network.http.sendRefererHeader to zero (0) from an about:config window. If nothing else works, you might try setting its value to either 1 or restoring the default value. Setting it to 1 allowed the Captcha boxes to piece of work over again on many of the sites I had started having trouble logging into fifty-fifty in Prophylactic Mode.

Read this answer in context 👍 0

Answer 1

Firefox 42+ has a Tracking Protection feature that is enabled by default in Individual Browsing mode. When you lot are in private browsing mode then Firefox tin testify a shield icon at the left end of the location/address bar that some content is afflicted.

You tin disable this feature in "Options/Preferences > Privacy" or via the virtually:privatebrowsing page that become when you open up a New Individual Window.

Options/Preferences > Privacy: "Employ Tracking Protection in Private Windows"

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/tracking-protection-firefox
https://back up.mozilla.org/en-United states/kb/control-center-site-privacy-and-security-firefox

You can effort these steps in case of issues with web pages:

Yous can reload web folio(s) and featherbed the cache to refresh perchance outdated or corrupted files.

concord downwardly the Shift key and left-click the Reload push button
press "Ctrl + F5" or press "Ctrl + Shift + R" (Windows,Linux)
press "Command + Shift + R" (Mac)

Clear the cache and remove the cookies from websites that crusade problems via the "iii-bar" Firefox menu push (Options/Preferences).

"Clear the cache":

Firefox/Options/Preferences -> Avant-garde -> Network -> Buried Web Content: "Clear Now"

"Remove the cookies" from websites that cause bug.

Firefox/Options/Preferences -> Privacy -> "Use custom settings for history" -> Cookies: "Show Cookies"

Start Firefox in Safe Mode to check if one of the extensions ("iii-bar" menu button or Tools -> Add together-ons -> Extensions) or if hardware dispatch is causing the problem.

switch to the DEFAULT theme: "3-bar" menu button or Tools -> Add together-ons -> Appearance
practice NOT click the "Refresh Firefox" button on the Condom Mode start window

https://back up.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/troubleshoot-firefox-problems-using-rubber-mode
https://support.mozilla.org/en-U.s.a./kb/troubleshoot-extensions-themes-to-set-issues

Firefox 42+ has a Tracking Protection characteristic that is enabled by default in Private Browsing style. When you lot are in individual browsing mode so Firefox tin testify a shield icon at the left finish of the location/address bar that some content is affected. Y'all can disable this feature in "Options/Preferences > Privacy" or via the about:privatebrowsing page that get when you open a New Individual Window. *Options/Preferences > Privacy: "Apply Tracking Protection in Private Windows" *https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/tracking-protection-firefox *https://support.mozilla.org/en-United states of america/kb/control-center-site-privacy-and-security-firefox ---- You lot can try these steps in case of issues with spider web pages: You tin reload web page(s) and bypass the enshroud to refresh possibly outdated or corrupted files. *hold downward the Shift cardinal and left-click the Reload push button *press "Ctrl + F5" or press "Ctrl + Shift + R" (Windows,Linux) *press "Command + Shift + R" (Mac) Clear the enshroud and remove the cookies from websites that cause issues via the "three-bar" Firefox carte du jour push button (Options/Preferences). "Articulate the enshroud": *Firefox/Options/Preferences -> Advanced -> Network -> Cached Web Content: "Clear Now" "Remove the cookies" from websites that cause problems. *Firefox/Options/Preferences -> Privacy -> "Employ custom settings for history" -> Cookies: "Show Cookies" Outset Firefox in <u>Safe Mode</u> to check if i of the extensions ("three-bar" carte push or Tools -> Add together-ons -> Extensions) or if hardware dispatch is causing the problem. *switch to the DEFAULT theme: "3-bar" bill of fare push or Tools -> Add together-ons -> Advent *do NOT click the "Refresh Firefox" button on the Safe Mode outset window *https://support.mozilla.org/en-The states/kb/troubleshoot-firefox-issues-using-safe-manner *https://support.mozilla.org/en-U.s.a./kb/troubleshoot-extensions-themes-to-fix-bug

Answer 2

cor-el said

....... Firefox 42+ has a Tracking Protection characteristic that is enabled by default in Private Browsing mode. Add-ons -> Appearance

do NOT click the "Refresh Firefox" button on the Rubber Mode start window

........

Thank you very much. Following all of your advice (steps), from top downwardly and eventually using process of elimination of add together-ons, and even with the most recent update, I found the culprit to be Mozilla. I would copy and paste from FF the information, but nosotros apparently are non allowed to copy whatever text out of the Add together-ons screens. Looks like the battle with the corporate Stalkers is virtually lost. Lightbeam was a good add-on for me that helped me cake cheesy, sleazy stalkers, and other nefarious sites.

''cor-el [[#reply-976222|said]]'' <blockquote> ....... Firefox 42+ has a Tracking Protection feature that is enabled by default in Individual Browsing way. Add-ons -> Advent *practise NOT click the "Refresh Firefox" button on the Safe Mode start window ........ </blockquote> Thanks very much. Following all of your communication (steps), from meridian down and eventually using procedure of emptying of add-ons, and even with the about contempo update, I found the culprit to be Mozilla. I would copy and paste from FF the information, simply we patently are not immune to copy any text out of the Add-ons screens. Looks like the battle with the corporate Stalkers is virtually lost. Lightbeam was a good addition for me that helped me cake cheesy, sleazy stalkers, and other nefarious sites.

Answer 3

I turned Tracking Protection off completely and I'm still getting "Google re-CAPTCHA failed to load. Please check your internet connection and reload this page."

Did I mention this is a simply-opened browser? And it'due south happening on MULTIPLE sites, and has been going on for MONTHS.

I likewise accept sites where video fails to load--not fifty-fifty the frame appears. Is this related?

I turned Tracking Protection off completely and I'm withal getting "Google re-CAPTCHA failed to load. Please cheque your internet connexion and reload this page." Did I mention this is a just-opened browser? And information technology's happening on MULTIPLE sites, and has been going on for MONTHS. I also have sites where video fails to load--not even the frame appears. Is this related?

Answer 4 · 2017-07-15T20:24:47-07:00

I am having the same problem with Firefox 54.0.1 32-bit nether Windows 10. The site is <https://verified.capitalone.com/challenge.html#/>, which is accessed via a redirect from <https://verified.capitalone.com/sic-ui/#/esignin?Product=360Bank>. I tin make it via Google Chrome, but not Firefox. I've done the post-obit:

Started Firefox in rubber way (no addons/default theme)
Non using private browsing
Cleared cache
Allowed all tertiary-political party cookies
Allowed pop-ups
Turned off all tracking protection
Used native Windows 10 firewall and antivirus only

Over fourth dimension, I've had increasing issues with more than and more sites in Firefox as they adopt the latest Recaptcha version. Capital One stopped working a couple of weeks ago when they switched to the Recaptcha version that requires identifying images containing cars, and pops up new images to replace the ones you select until at that place are no more cars. I am hoping this can be fixed, please.

I am having the aforementioned trouble with Firefox 54.0.1 32-bit under Windows 10. The site is <https://verified.capitalone.com/challenge.html#/>, which is accessed via a redirect from <https://verified.capitalone.com/sic-ui/#/esignin?Product=360Bank>. I tin get in via Google Chrome, but not Firefox. I've done the following: * Started Firefox in rubber mode (no addons/default theme) * Non using private browsing * Cleared cache * Allowed all third-party cookies * Allowed pop-ups * Turned off all tracking protection * Used native Windows ten firewall and antivirus simply Over time, I've had increasing bug with more than and more sites in Firefox as they adopt the latest Recaptcha version. Capital One stopped working a couple of weeks ago when they switched to the Recaptcha version that requires identifying images containing cars, and pops up new images to supercede the ones you select until in that location are no more than cars. I am hoping this can be fixed, please.

Modified July 15, 2017 at 8:24:47 PM PDT by fizzbowen

Answer 5

Did you try Firefox Safe Way in case an extension in blocking content?

An URL with a hash appended usually ways that some JavaScript is involved. You tin check the Web Panel for mistake messages.

https://developer.mozilla.org/Tools/Web_Console

Are you allowing redirection?

"iii-bar" menu button -> Options/Preferences -> Advanced -> General
Accessibility : [ ] "Warn me when web sites try to redirect or reload the folio"

The setting in "Options/Preferences -> Advanced -> General" is meant as an accessibility feature, every bit you tin can come across by the label of that department, so that people with disabilities or people who employ screen readers practice non get confused and is not meant equally a condom protection to stop redirecting.

See also:

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/settings-network-updates-and-encryption#w_general-tab
http://kb.mozillazine.org/accessibility.blockautorefresh
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Accessibility_features_of_Firefox

Did y'all try Firefox Safe Mode in example an extension in blocking content? An URL with a hash appended usually means that some JavaScript is involved. Y'all can bank check the Spider web Panel for mistake letters. *https://developer.mozilla.org/Tools/Web_Console ---- Are you assuasive redirection? *"three-bar" menu push -> Options/Preferences -> Advanced -> General<br>Accessibility : [ ] "Warn me when web sites attempt to redirect or reload the folio" The setting in "Options/Preferences -> Advanced -> General" is meant as an accessibility feature, as yous can come across by the label of that section, so that people with disabilities or people who utilize screen readers do not get confused and is not meant equally a condom protection to end redirecting. See likewise: *https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/settings-network-updates-and-encryption#w_general-tab *http://kb.mozillazine.org/accessibility.blockautorefresh *http://kb.mozillazine.org/Accessibility_features_of_Firefox

Answer 6

I don't understand why is it that we have to step back, click links and read walls of text brimming full of techinese just to use a browser in it's basic bare-os off-the-rack, completely updated, upgraded with anti-virus dropped, malware protection dropped.

I thought the idea behind FF was so we didn't have to become kiddie-koders merely to grasp some of the volumes of contents from the many 'try this' links.

It would also help hither if those responding, named to whom the reply is directed. i.east. Who are you lot talking to? And who are you lot suggesting your tweaks to?

I take used Moz products since Netscape starting time version and information technology's astonishing how, with the Internet, once called the "Information Highway", at present the Google Catalogue" of junk, that a browser user needs so much knowledge, pay so much attention to tweaking and twonking just to get past a simple captcha.

Suggestion to the coders. Stop trying to make information technology improve, only make it work remembering that merely considering so many kids out in that location want to add so many totally unnecessary bells a whistles to a site, doesn't mean Mozilla needs to suit them.

I use both now. Firefox and Chrome. Firefox for privacy when researching, and Chrome when I'm forced by government, utility, and corporate sites, to disrobe and run naked on their sites whilst they review my one time personal information and Internet habits.

I don't sympathize why is information technology that we have to step back, click links and read walls of text chock full of techinese just to utilise a browser in it'due south basic bare-bone off-the-rack, completely updated, upgraded with anti-virus dropped, malware protection dropped. I idea the idea behind FF was so we didn't take to become kiddie-koders only to grasp some of the volumes of contents from the many 'try this' links. It would also help here if those responding, named to whom the answer is directed. i.eastward. Who are you talking to? And who are you suggesting your tweaks to? I take used Moz products since Netscape first version and it's amazing how, with the Internet, once called the "Information Highway", now the Google Catalogue" of junk, that a browser user needs then much cognition, pay and so much attention to tweaking and twonking just to get past a simple captcha. Suggestion to the coders. Stop trying to arrive better, just make it work remembering that simply considering so many kids out at that place desire to add so many totally unnecessary bells a whistles to a site, doesn't hateful Mozilla needs to accommodate them. I use both at present. Firefox and Chrome. Firefox for privacy when researching, and Chrome when I'grand forced past government, utility, and corporate sites, to disrobe and run naked on their sites whilst they review my once personal information and Net habits.

Answer 7

I hold 100% with Outernaut. FF was in one case a convenient, like shooting fish in a barrel to use browser that handled everything. Now if I want to lookout a video on any site but Youtube or visit a site that requires a Captcha I've got to switch to Chrome or IE - WHY? All those pages of Gobledegeek yous've got to wade thru' only to detect the set up doesn't piece of work should not be necessary. How virtually y'all bring out 2 versions of FF - one for the whizz-kid, kiddie-koder, all the bells & whistles gobledegeek lovers to play with, & another simple version for us normal users? I have tried every ready & plant that information technology is impossible to get a Captcha or a non-Youtube video to work on FF - WHY? Come-on guys, putting out browser that only partially works is just not expert plenty.

I concord 100% with Outernaut. FF was once a user-friendly, easy to utilize browser that handled everything. At present if I want to lookout man a video on any site but Youtube or visit a site that requires a Captcha I've got to switch to Chrome or IE - WHY? All those pages of Gobledegeek you've got to wade thru' only to find the fix doesn't work should not be necessary. How about y'all bring out 2 versions of FF - i for the whizz-kid, kiddie-koder, all the bells & whistles gobledegeek lovers to play with, & another simple version for united states of america normal users? I have tried every fix & plant that it is impossible to become a Captcha or a non-Youtube video to piece of work on FF - WHY? Come-on guys, putting out browser that only partially works is merely not good enough.

Answer 8 · 2017-07-29T22:04:36-07:00

Chosen Solution

I also had this trouble, and found some other thing to attempt if none of the above piece of work. If you hate beingness tracked and are a browser tweaker, you may (at some point in the past) have adjusted the value of network.http.sendRefererHeader to zero (0) from an about:config window. If nothing else works, you might attempt setting its value to either i or restoring the default value. Setting it to 1 allowed the Captcha boxes to work over again on many of the sites I had started having trouble logging into even in Safe Mode.

I besides had this problem, and establish some other thing to attempt if none of the higher up work. If you hate existence tracked and are a browser tweaker, you may (at some indicate in the past) have adapted the value of '''network.http.sendRefererHeader''' to zero (0) from an about:config window. If nothing else works, you might try setting its value to either 1 or restoring the default value. Setting it to i immune the Captcha boxes to work again on many of the sites I had started having trouble logging into fifty-fifty in Safe Mode.

Modified July 29, 2017 at 10:04:36 PM PDT past fizzbowen

Answer 9

Why does everyone politely phone call information technology "tracking"? If whatever one of the states did what these 'trackers' exercise, we'd be charged with "Stalking" and that is what hey are, they are Stalkers. Painting these Stalkers with the illusion of beingness merely a tracker only encourages those [ redacted ] to build even more intrusive privacy invaders. Call them out for what they are; spying stalkers, peeping Stalkers - Orwellian Overseers or worse, for they are no longer trackers - not anymore.

Why does everyone politely telephone call it "tracking"? If any one of united states of america did what these 'trackers' do, nosotros'd be charged with "Stalking" and that is what hey are, they are Stalkers. Painting these Stalkers with the illusion of being simply a tracker only encourages those [ redacted ] to build fifty-fifty more than intrusive privacy invaders. Call them out for what they are; spying stalkers, peeping Stalkers - Orwellian Overseers or worse, for they are no longer trackers - non anymore.

Answer 10 · 2017-07-30T14:37:39-07:00

what does this setting do?

network.http.sendRefererHeader;ii

what does this setting practise? network.http.sendRefererHeader;2

Modified July xxx, 2017 at ii:37:39 PM PDT by Steve

Answer 11

Outernaut said

Why does everyone politely call it "tracking"? If any one of the states did what these 'trackers' do, we'd be charged with "Stalking" and that is what hey are, they are Stalkers. Painting these Stalkers with the illusion of beingness merely a tracker only encourages those [ redacted ] to build even more intrusive privacy invaders. Telephone call them out for what they are; spying stalkers, peeping Stalkers - Orwellian Overseers or worse, for they are no longer trackers - not anymore.

Y'all "agreed" to it in the fine print when yous started using information technology. Not any unlike from what cell phones and even cars do. Unfortunately the time to put the brakes on this stuff came and went years agone.

''Outernaut [[#answer-991566|said]]'' <blockquote> Why does everyone politely call information technology "tracking"? If any one of us did what these 'trackers' exercise, we'd be charged with "Stalking" and that is what hey are, they are Stalkers. Painting these Stalkers with the illusion of being just a tracker but encourages those [ redacted ] to build even more intrusive privacy invaders. Call them out for what they are; spying stalkers, peeping Stalkers - Orwellian Overseers or worse, for they are no longer trackers - non anymore. </blockquote> Yous "agreed" to information technology in the fine print when you started using information technology. Not whatsoever dissimilar from what cell phones and even cars do. Unfortunately the time to put the brakes on this stuff came and went years agone.

Answer 12

fizzbowen said

I also had this trouble, and found some other thing to try if none of the higher up work. If you hate being tracked and are a browser tweaker, yous may (at some betoken in the by) take adjusted the value of network.http.sendRefererHeader to zero (0) from an nearly:config window. If nothing else works, you might try setting its value to either i or restoring the default value. Setting it to i allowed the Captcha boxes to work again on many of the sites I had started having problem logging into fifty-fifty in Safe Mode.

Mine'due south set at "2" and I'm having problem with more and more than sites.

''fizzbowen [[#reply-991563|said]]'' <blockquote> I besides had this problem, and institute some other thing to try if none of the above work. If you hate beingness tracked and are a browser tweaker, you lot may (at some bespeak in the past) take adjusted the value of '''network.http.sendRefererHeader''' to nil (0) from an about:config window. If nada else works, you lot might endeavour setting its value to either ane or restoring the default value. Setting it to 1 allowed the Captcha boxes to work over again on many of the sites I had started having problem logging into even in Safe Mode. </blockquote> Mine's gear up at "2" and I'm having trouble with more and more sites.

Answer 13

Y'all should leave prefs like network.http.sendRefererHeader (2) to their default. Yous may run into odd furnishings when you disable the referrer.

You should leave prefs like network.http.sendRefererHeader (two) to their default. You may encounter odd effects when y'all disable the referrer.

Answer 14

cor-el said

You should leave prefs like network.http.sendRefererHeader (2) to their default. You may see odd effects when you disable the referrer.

Is information technology non possible that one of those "odd effects" might result in a tad more added privacy? ;)

I'm very afraid that FireFox may no longer concur it'south own. It is the last true user-controlled browser that may protect us from the scoundrels, shysters, and ner'r-exercise-wells (they would be government, corporations and ISP stalkers; AKA PIPs (Peeping Internet Perverts).

O

''cor-el [[#respond-992196|said]]'' <blockquote> You should go out prefs like network.http.sendRefererHeader (ii) to their default. You may come across odd furnishings when you disable the referrer. </blockquote> Is it non possible that one of those "odd effects" might effect in a tad more than added privacy? ;) I'yard very afraid that FireFox may no longer hold it's ain. It is the last true user-controlled browser that may protect us from the scoundrels, shysters, and ner'r-do-wells (they would exist government, corporations and ISP stalkers; AKA PIPs (Peeping Internet Perverts). O

Answer 15 · 2017-08-01T02:23:18-07:00

cor-el said

You should exit prefs like network.http.sendRefererHeader (2) to their default. You lot may meet odd furnishings when you disable the referrer.

I don't know plenty to mess with this so it's all the same at its original setting. Information technology says 'default' in the settings cavalcade so I guess 2 is the default. I will change it from ii to 0 & see what happens. I'll report back on the outcome. I've just read a few more than replies & I'one thousand dislocated. What to the numbers mean? Is 0 disable & and then one = permit & ii = ask user etc? What is the best setting 0 or 1?

''cor-el [[#answer-992196|said]]'' <blockquote> Yous should leave prefs like network.http.sendRefererHeader (2) to their default. You may meet odd effects when yous disable the referrer. </blockquote> I don't know plenty to mess with this so information technology's nonetheless at its original setting. It says 'default' in the settings cavalcade so I judge 2 is the default. I will change it from 2 to 0 & see what happens. I'll study back on the consequence. I've only read a few more replies & I'thousand dislocated. What to the numbers mean? Is 0 disable & and so 1 = allow & 2 = enquire user etc? What is the best setting 0 or i?

Modified August ane, 2017 at two:23:xviii AM PDT by Steve

Answer 16

The default is best and makes Firefox send the referrer with all request. Some servers use the referrer to make sure the request originates from a page on their website and block files if the referrer is missing or wrong.

More information:

http://kb.mozillazine.org/network.http.sendRefererHeader

The default is best and makes Firefox send the referrer with all request. Some servers use the referrer to make sure the asking originates from a folio on their website and block files if the referrer is missing or incorrect. More data: *http://kb.mozillazine.org/network.http.sendRefererHeader